| 
    
    Thin-film microstrip lines (TFMSL) are miniaturized microstrip lines, (a 
    signal conductor, a dielectric and a ground conductor), located on top of 
    the silicon substrate or the carrier substrate. (Fig.1) The ground 
    metallization shields the line from the silicon substrate effects; therefore 
    low resistivity silicon substrates can be used without deteriorating 
    microwave performance. Using high-quality polymers as dielectric, e.g. BCB 
    or polyimide, TFMSLs have attenuation comparable with coplanar waveguides in 
    GaAs microwave integrated circuits. TFMSLs find more and more applications 
    in Si-based monolithic microwave integrated circuits and as transmission 
    lines in multichip modules.
     
    
      
    
    
    Fig.1 TFMSL cross section 
    
    
    The propagation parameters of TFMSL can be precise and efficient described 
    using a simplified model. The model used differs considerable from the 
    conventional microstrip lines because of the differences in geometrical 
    dimensions. For conventional microstrip lines height and width of the signal 
    conductor are in the range of hundreds of microns. For TFMSLs these values 
    are around 10 µm, in the order of magnitude of metallization thickness. 
    Small dimensions increase conductor loss and finite metal conductivity and 
    internal inductance have been taken into account. Phase constant and 
    characteristic impedance deviate considerably from the lossless case and 
    show typical increase toward lower frequencies known from coplanar 
    waveguides.A distributed equivalent circuit model (Fig.2) can be used for 
    describing TFMSLs. 
    
    
      
    
    Fig.2 Distributed equivalent-circuit model of the TFMSL 
    
    
    The elements of the equivalent circuit (the inductance per unit length L, 
    the capacitance per unit length C, the resistance per unit length R and the 
    conductance per unit length G) are related to different physical effects and 
    can be determined separately. The model used to describe the dependence vs. 
    frequency of the TFMSL parameters is practical and efficient and is based on 
    the numerous approaches for microstrip lines available in the literature 
    [1-5]. The capacitance per unit length can be calculated by means of 
    Hammerstad and Jensen formulas[4] : 
    
      
    
    
    where co is free-space light velocity, 
    er,eff 
    is the effective relative dielectric constant, ZLO is the 
    characteristic impedance for lossless case with t=0 and weq,0 is 
    the equivalent signal conductor width without dielectric substrate, which 
    takes into account the finite thickness of the signal conductor.The 
    conductance per unit length G account for the dielectric loss of the 
    substrate, described by the dielectric loss tangent, tan(de). 
    
      
    
    
    C and G/w 
    are frequency independent up to the beginning of the non-TEM dispersion 
    (well beyond 100 GHz for typical TFMSLs). The line resistance R and 
    inductance L exhibit a considerable frequency dependence. The frequency 
    dependence is determined by the change of current density distribution in 
    the nonideal conductors, due to the varying current penetration into the 
    conductors when increasing the frequency. At low frequencies near dc the 
    current density is homogenous over all conductor cross sections. At high 
    frequencies, the skin-effect range all the conductor dimensions are large 
    compared with skin depth 
    d
    and the current flows only in a shallow area at the conductor surface. 
    Between these two regions there is a transient range that may be widely 
    extended. Djorgjevic and Sarkar formulas [3] for R and L are used to calculate R and L 
    for the entire frequency range, taking into account the external inductance covering the magnetic field outside of the conductor, the internal inductance describing the magnetic field inside the conductor, the conductor resistance under skin-effect and dc conditions. The propagation quantities, i.e. complex characteristic impedance ZL,eq, attenuation aeq and effective relative dielectric constant er,eff,eq can be determined based on the equivalent-circuit elements R,L,C,G. 
    | 
    
   
    
    
    Fig.3,4,5 present effective relative dielectric constant, attenuation and 
    real of characteristic impedance for a TFMSL with w=8µm, hs=1.7µm, 
    t=0.8µm, wg=88µm, conductivity of the metallization k=2.5*107S/m, 
    BCB with er=2.7 and tan(de)=0.015. 
    
    
      
    
    Fig.3. Effective relative dielectric constant vs.frequency 
    
    
      
    
    
    Fig.4. Attenuation vs.frequency 
    
    
      
    
    
    Fig.5. Real(Z) vs.frequency 
    
    
    Accuracy of this model is established by comparing the line parameters to 
    numerical full-wave simulation results, which takes into account conductor 
    and dielectric losses [4].There are some geometrical limitations related to 
    the metal thickness, signal and ground-conductor width, which restrict the 
    range of validity of the model. But, once these conditions are fulfilled the 
    model yields under 2% to 8% deviations for propagation quantities, an 
    accuracy sufficient for application of the model in practical circuit 
    design. The frequency range of validity extends down to dc and well into the 
    submillimeter-wave range. 
    
    
    References 
1. H.Wheeler "Transmission-line Properties of a Strip on a Dielectric 
    Sheet on a Plane" IEEE Trans.Microwave Theory Tech. Vol.25, no.8, 1977 
    2. F.Schneider, W. Heinrich "Model of Thin-Film Microstripe Line for 
    Circuit Design" IEEE Trans.Microwave Theory Tech. Vol.49, no.1, 2001 
    3. A. Djordjevic, T. Sakar "Closed-Form Formulas for 
    Frequency-Dependent Resistance and Inductance per Unit Length of Microstrip 
    and Strip Transmission Line" IEEE Trans.Microwave Theory Tech. Vol.42, no.2, 
    1994 
    4. E. Hammerstad, O. Jensen "Accurate Model for Microstripe 
    Computer-aided Design" IEEE MTT-S Int.Microwave Symp.Dig. 1980, pp.407-409 
    5. W. Heinrich "Full-wave Analysis of Conductor Losses on MMIC 
    Transmission Lines" IEEE Trans.Microwave Theory Tech. Vol.38, no.10, 1990 
     |